Redefining Time for Emerging Markets

Having been entrenched in emerging market economic and investment analysis for more than 20 years as both professor and portfolio manager, Peter Marber has witnessed immense progress and change at the hands of globalisation. Here the Head of Emerging Markets Investments at Loomis, Sayles & Company shares his thoughts on the need to reclassify emerging markets (EM).

Peter Marber

Head of Emerging Markets Investments Loomis Sayles

You are calling for redefining emerging markets. Why is that?

The question of what constitutes an emerging market has haunted me for decades. Since 1989, the World Bank has defined an emerging market as a country with gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of $13,000 or less. But GDP is simply a “wealth” statistic. A country with $12,999 in GDP per capita is very different from one with $1,500. Thus a new, multi-dimensional method of classifying emerging markets is called for, one that takes into account a cluster of different indicators to produce a ranking of countries’ socioeconomic maturation.

Can you explain the basis of your research?

I started asking myself, besides GDP, what are the other dimensions that define a country’s maturation? Are there more objective ways to analyse and cluster countries? Are not countries more nuanced than the blunt descriptions “advanced” and “emerging”? My gut feeling was yes, but I needed an objective, “big data” framework to answer these big questions. So last year I probed these questions using Ward’s Method, a quantitative approach that clusters things based on the “minimum variance” of certain factors – that is, grouping things whose qualities were statistically most similar.

My idea was to batch approximately 100 countries (both advanced and emerging) into 10 clusters. Group 10 would have the highest scores awarded for nine specific criteria, denoting more mature countries that may be more resilient to potential shifts and shocks. Group 1 would have the lowest scores, signifying those countries that are less mature and more likely to be vulnerable to an array of risks. The members of each group were arrived at by assigning numerical values to each country reflecting the nine distinct categories. Thus a country with a high per capita GDP would be given a high score in the category concerned with this metric. The other eight categories include two for population size and competitiveness, three for credit ratings, stock market penetration and currency valuations, and three for health, education and political climate.

To offer a view on the changes that took place over an important decade of globalisation – five years leading up to the 2008 crisis and five years following it – we compared year-end 2003 and year-end 2013.

What has your research revealed?

First of all, it was fascinating to see that the numerical scores from five economies didn’t cluster well with any of the 10 cluster groups because of outsized endowments in one or more areas. These countries included:

  • U.S., because of its large and wealthy population
  • China, due to its huge population
  • India, because of its large population
  • Hong Kong, due to high wealth, strong financial development and small population
  • Qatar, an outlier because of its wealthy and small population

Second, most “emerging” countries rose up the ranking during the decade while some “advanced” economies slipped. Among the big advancers were Ghana, which climbed from Group 1 to Group 5, while big losers included Iceland, Ireland, Italy and Spain, which all slipped from Group 10 down to Group 8. The two big surprises came from the Middle East, with Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates dropping from Group 8 to Group 4.

China’s dramatic rise is also noteworthy. It has a credit rating similar to or better than most advanced economies (AA- Standard & Poor’s), while also having the world’s second-largest stock market and an economy that ranks second in size to the U.S. in nominal terms. These dimensions – together with the fact that its economy is almost as large as all other emerging markets combined – argue for removing China from its current classification as an emerging market and creating a separate category for it alone. The only country that is remotely comparable to China is the U.S.


Overall, the world appears to have begun to converge. Both the developed, western economies and “emerging markets” have shifted towards more middle ground.

Where do we go from here?

One insight the study throws up is that it may be instructive to view the development of countries as a continuum in which each stage of socioeconomic progress may not be perceptibly different from the others, though the extremes are quite distinct. Indeed, because many “emerging” countries have closed many socioeconomic gaps and converged with “advanced” ones, it is now tough to say where “emerging” ends and “advanced” begins. Clearly we need more categories of countries than two like “advanced” and “emerging.”

What’s the take-away for investors?

The so-called emerging markets are now generally more mature than they were a decade ago and too big for investors to ignore. Today, they contribute more than 50% of global output on a purchasing power parity basis; most have robust “investment grade” credit ratings and have fast-growing financial markets.*

*Source: Loomis, Sayles & Company Research, as of August 17, 2015.


Emerging Market (Economy): a nation's economy that is progressing toward becoming advanced, as shown by some liquidity in local debt and equity markets and the existence of some form of market exchange and regulatory body. Emerging markets generally do not have the level of market efficiency and strict standards in accounting and securities regulation to be on par with advanced economies (such as the United States, Europe and Japan), but emerging markets will typically have a physical financial infrastructure including banks, a stock exchange and a unified currency.

Globalisation: the tendency of investment funds and businesses to move beyond domestic and national markets to other markets around the globe, thereby increasing the interconnectedness of different markets. Globalisation has had the effect of markedly increasing not only international trade, but also cultural exchange.

Investment-grade credit rating refers to the quality of a company's credit. In order to be considered an investment-grade issue, the company must be rated at 'BBB' or higher by Standard and Poor's or Moody's.

Purchasing-power parity is the rate at which the currency of one country would have to be converted into that of another country to buy the same amount of goods and services in each country.

The World Bank: an international organisation dedicated to providing financing, advice and research to developing nations to aid their economic advancement.

Published in October 2015

Loomis, Sayles & Company, L.P.
One Financial Center
Boston, MA 02111

This material is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or as a recommendation to buy or sell, or as an offer of, any security referred to herein. The author(s) may have financial interest in one or more of the securities discussed.

The views expressed are those of the author(s) posting those views. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Natixis Global Asset Management (“NGAM”) or any of its affiliated entities. The views and opinions expressed may change based on market and other conditions and are subject to change at any time, and there can be no assurance that developments will transpire as forecasted. The opinions and information referenced are dated as indicated and cannot be relied upon as current thereafter.

Copyright © 2016 NATIXIS GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT S.A. – All rights reserved


The Blockchain is on the verge of revolutionising asset management

What is natural capital?

VIDEO (3’19) – Gautier Quéru, Director of the Land Degradation Neutrality Fund Project at Mirova

Aviation Letter

Annual outlook of aircraft industry

2018 Market Outlook

Natixis Investment Managers’ affiliates share their thoughts on what might be on the horizon for investors in 2018.

Indices in Hot Water

The carbon footprint of the major equity indices exceeds the +2°C objective of the Paris Climate Agreement (COP 21).

US Municipal Bonds

Non-US investors could benefit from allocating to US municipal bonds

Finance and climate change

French institutional investors are bound by the Energy transition law to take action.

Aviation Letter

Annual outlook of aircraft industry

French Election

What does the outcome mean for global financial markets?

It’s Time for Real Assets

Private debt can be a lower-risk, higher-yielding alternative to traditional bonds

Real Estate Debt

An alternative to conventional fixed income investments

Green Bond Principles

Mirova discusses market standards and the lack of a regulatory body for Green Bonds

Real Estate Alchemy

Transforming non-core assets into prime property requires skill and resources

Referendum in Italy

Our expert’s insights into the 4th December's Italian referendum and its impact on financial markets.

U.S. Election

Americans elected their 45th U.S. President on November 8. What does the outcome mean for global financial markets?

Crisis Alpha

Managed futures may provide shelter from storms and diversified returns in calm markets

Credit Migration

Worse than you think, not as bad as you fear

Active Share

How passive is your active manager?

Hop Aboard the U.S Growth Engine

Mid-market private companies have the potential to expand rapidly while avoiding high exposure to volatile public markets

2016 Global Retirement Index

4 key trends shaping the future of retirement security: access, incentives, engagement and economics.

Insurance Survey:

companies grapple with new regulatory constraints, capital rules and increased risks

Diversified Growth Funds

Seeking to respond to rapid shifts in markets while reducing risk.

Institutional Investors Outlook:

Institutional investors bullish on stocks, alternatives in 2016, wary of global political tensions

Worldwide Currency War, Who Wins?

Implications of China’s surprise yuan devaluation, a strong U.S. dollar and weak emerging market currencies.